The Case Against GSE Privatization

  • January 17, 2017

Among the list of impending policy changes under the new administration, there has been ample talk about the privatization of Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae.  The lenders became government sponsored entities in the wake of the financial crisis, accepting a $188 Billion bailout.  Since they were placed under conservator-ship, the GSEs have repaid their bailout and more to the US Treasury.  With the housing market rising to pre-recession strength and mortgage rates hovering historical lows the question arises, is it time to take Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae out of government conservator-ship? 

The Kroll Bond Rating Agency sent out a research note examining some of the potential challenges of taking Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae out of government conservator-ship.  In the note, KBRA stated:

The GSEs provide a substantial subsidy to the housing finance market first by using the superior credit standing of the U.S. government to support the sale of securities secured by 1-4 family home loans. […]  The GSEs also act as guarantor for these mortgage securities, taking the first-loss credit risk on the underlying loans. By guaranteeing the credit risk, the GSEs make it easier for the bond market to deal with the long and variable duration risk of a 30-year mortgage.  Finally, the implicit governmental guarantee for the securities issued by the GSEs makes possible a forward, “to be announced” (TBA), market that allows for the efficient management of interest rate risk. Mortgage lenders are able to hedge their interest rate risk against a homogenous and fungible agency security in the future, usually 30-60 days forward.”

The KBRA asserts that privatization can cause more problems than it solves.  The cost of taking Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae out of government conservator-ship could be passed on to the consumer, paying higher interest rates.  KBRA Senior Managing Director, Christopher Whalen, predicted, “If you were to [privatize Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae], the cost of a mortgage for your average consumer would go up several points — it would be more like 6 or 7 percent — because private investors are just not willing to take the risk.”



Sources: HousingWire, MarketPlace


Kimberly Allen
Branch Manager
NMLS # 431903
Branch NMLS # 1666986

Kimberly Allen

PHONE: (415) 324-1000

CMG Image
© CMG Financial, All Rights Reserved. CMG Financial is a registered trade name of CMG Mortgage, Inc., NMLS ID #1820 in most, but not all states. CMG Mortgage, Inc. is an equal opportunity lender with corporate office located at 3160 Crow Canyon Road, Suite 400, San Ramon, CA 94583 888-264-4663. Licensed by the Department of Business Oversight under the California Residential Mortgage Lending Act No. 4150025; AK #AK1820; AZ #0903132; Colorado regulated by the Division of Real Estate; Georgia Residential Mortgage Licensee #15438; Illinois Residential Mortgage Licensee; Kansas Licensed Mortgage Company #MC.0001160; Massachusetts Mortgage Lender License #MC1820 and Mortgage Broker License #MC1820; Mississippi Licensed Mortgage Company Licensed by the Mississippi Department of Banking and Consumer Finance; Licensed by the New Hampshire Banking Department; Licensed by the NJ Department of Banking and Insurance; Licensed Mortgage Banker – NYS Department of Financial Services; Ohio Mortgage Broker Act Mortgage Banker Exemption #MBMB.850204.000; Licensed by the Oregon Division of Financial Regulation #ML-3000; Rhode Island Licensed Lender #20142986LL; and Licensed by the Virginia State Corporation Commission #MC-5521. CMG Mortgage, Inc. is licensed in all 50 states and the District of Columbia. Offer of credit is subject to credit approval. For information about our company, please visit us at www.cmgfi.com. To verify our complete list of state licenses, please visit www.cmgfi.com/corporate/licensing and NMLS Consumer Access (www.nmlsconsumeraccess.org).